Sunday, November 24, 2013

Alford V. Greene—How an Unreasonable Seizure Led to an Unreasonable Interview

Nabeel Basit Final DraftPPP&L journal Alford v. GreeneHow an ludicrous Seizure Led To an Unreasonable Interview I. demonstration Alford v. Greene dealt with the unconstitutional seizure of a young girl. In Alford v. Greene and Greene v. Camreta (which was consolidated into Alford v. Greene), caseworker Greene and substitute Sheriff Alford seized a young girl and interrogated her in a private confidence at her elementary cultivate for two hours. This was done without a warrant, app arent cause, or maternal consent, because they pretend the mothers husband whitethorn have been versedly molesting the girl and her sister. Deputy Alford had a panoptic firearm during the interview. Later, caseworker Greene secured a apostrophize order removing both daughters from their mothers custody for a period of 20 days. During this time, the girls were in department of Human Services custody and underwent sexual abuse assessments and examinations external of their mo thers presence. The Fourth Amendment guarantees that the right of the people to be secureagainst senseless searches and seizures, shall not be violate, and no warrants shall tailor, simply upon probable cause. In the case of Alford v. Greene, the mother of nine-year-old S.G. filed a get on her behalf, pursuant(predicate) to the Fourth Amendment and 42 U.S.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
C §1983. Specifically, the girls mother, Sarah Greene, alleges that the caseworker, Bob Camreta, and representative sheriff, James Alford, violated S.G.s Fourth Amendment rights when they seized and interrogated her in a private stain at her school for two hours without a warrant, probable cause, or! parental consent. This note will sell the Fourth Amendment issue of an unreasonable seizure without a warrant, parental consent, or probable cause. There can be an proof drawn that law departments that are unwilling to follow procedures in regard to searches and seizures, are unlikely to follow, or even have, procedures to train the interview of the babe is done...If you want to get a amply essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.